The Who’s Who discrepancy shows that this plot point was thought of on the fly, and given that WW is the ONLY exposition we get about Nika in 1018 chapters it is safe to say that is when the seed was planted - Impel Down, Amazon Lily, Fishman Island, so many opportunities to mention this legendary figure but it never happened, this reveal was ridiculously poorly handled considering its impact on the story and Oda’s usual standard of plot twists and payoff Luffy could still be Joyboy/Sun God/Warrior of Liberation without removing all subtlety altogether and spoon feeding the readers, I am sure readers are intelligent enough to grasp this concept without having to give him the literal Sun God Nika Joyboy fruit This is what happens when people don't accept that they're wrong. That title is determined by who is the strongest.Įdit: He blocked me without responding, so if he edited his retarded comment above he didn't want me to see it. Mihawk does not fight Shanks because he knows Shanks cannot beat him, he calls him a "1 armed has been." 1 Master Swordsman absolutely means Worlds Strongest Swordsman. Zoro will become the #1 Master Swordsman by being strong enough to defeat Mihawk meaning he will be stronger than Mihawk. See this is why your argument is dumb, because who has the title of "#1 Master Swordsman" is determined by strength so saying "#1 doesn't equal strongest" is objectively wrong.
If Shanks was strong enough to kill Mihawk RIGHT NOW, Mihawk would be challenging him every other week, but he doesn't. It's because after Shanks lost his arm, he lost faith that Shanks would ever be strong enough to kill him, meaning he could no longer take his title. Mohawk in fact only challenges swordsman he believes could beat him, it's the only reason he left Zoro alive after seeing his potential. So why doesn't Mihawk fight Shanks anymore? They used to constantly battle to find out who was superior. Ight, so Mihawk is the #1 master swordsman, how does someone take this title from him and become the new #1 master swordsman? By defeating him? Yes, okay so if you are strong enough to defeat the #1 Master Swordsman, you prove that you are the #1 Master Swordsman and gain the title. Ight bro, let's entertain this irrational thought that "#1 Master Swordsman" doesn't mean the strongest swordsman.
0 kommentar(er)
